2023年3月15日

12:00 PM我雖然聊天機器人自己絕不是新的,克勞德的繁殖是一個更加強大的工具,互聯網上大規模的訓練來生成文本,模仿人類語言遠比他們的前輩。——圖像通過DCStudio Freepik人為,一個人工智能的啟動,讓競爭對手chatbot OpenAI流行ChatGPT可供企業想將它添加到他們的產品。創業公司,創建於2021年的前領導人OpenAI,包括兄弟姐妹Daniela和達裏奧Amodei chatbot說,叫克勞德,過去幾個月一直在測試實驗室(aapl . o:行情)等科技公司的概念,DuckDuckGo Quora (aapl . o:行情)和搜索引擎。Quora,例如,包括應用程序稱為坡的聊天機器人,它可以讓用戶問問題。公司希望使用克勞德通過等待名單可以注冊。人為的目標是提供在幾天內的請求。啟動也叫克勞德即時提供一個版本,不太強大,但更便宜、更快。本月早些時候,OpenAI ChatGPT企業發布。雖然聊天機器人自己絕不是新的,克勞德的繁殖是一個更加強大的工具,互聯網上大規模的訓練來生成文本,模仿人類語言遠比他們的前輩。這樣的工具是一個應用程序生成的人工智能,指人工智能係統,考慮輸入如文本提示和使用它來輸出文本或圖像等新內容。 OpenAI released ChatGPT for widespread testing in November, unleashing a stampede of tech companies unveiling their own chatbots. In February, Google said it started testing its version, Bard, while Microsoft Corp which has invested US$11bil (RM49bil) in OpenAI, added a chatbot based on the startup’s technology to its Bing search engine. Alphabet Inc’s Google has invested almost US$400mil (RM1.79bil) in Anthropic, Bloomberg reported in February, citing a person familiar with the deal. Similar to ChatGPT, Claude is a large language model that can be used for a range of written tasks like summarizing, searching, answering questions and coding. Yet while ChatGPT has faced criticism – and been tweaked – after offering users some disturbing results, Anthropic is positioning its chatbot as more cautious from the start. Essentially, it’s meant to be harder to wring offensive results from it. Anthropic chief executive officer Dario Amodei said the startup has been slowly rolling out tests of Claude. "I don’t want to say all the problems have been solved,” Amodei said. "I think all of these models, including ours, they sometimes hallucinate, they sometimes make things up.” When used recently via Quora’s Poe app, Claude was easy to converse with, offered snappy answers, and, when this reporter was unhappy with its answers, responded apologetically. For instance, in one exchange via the Poe app, the chatbot was asked to suggest nicknames for a daughter and then for a son. When the bot was questioned about the results – which included champ, buddy and tiger for a boy and sweet pea, princess and angel for a girl – Claude acknowledged its suggestions "fell into some gender stereotypes.” "I appreciate you calling out my gender bias,” it typed. "I will be more mindful of avoiding stereotypes in the future. The most important thing is that nicknames are chosen with love and show appreciation for your child’s unique qualities.” This exchange looks like cautiousness on the part of the chatbot. But many people will simply take the chatbot’s initial answers and move on, rather than asking a follow-up question like the one that prompted Claude to detail its bias, said Julie Carpenter, a research scientist and fellow in the Ethics and Emerging Sciences Group at California Polytechnic State University at San Luis Obispo. "It only explained the bias when you followed up with a critical question,” she said. "If you had not exposed the bias, it would have just presented it as an answer. And that is the potential harm that you found.” – Bloomberg Article type: free