Marc美林

2022年6月23日

何鴻燊在州法院。他扮演兩個人欺騙亞馬遜Web服務和穀歌。——開爾文莊瑞豪/新加坡海峽時報/安:新加坡扮演兩個人欺騙亞馬遜網絡服務(AWS)和穀歌提供大約5.4美元mil價值(7.5毫升或RM23.78mil新元)的雲計算服務,這樣他就可以運行一個大型cryptocurrency采礦工作。32歲的何小君,在黑暗中非法獲取個人信息網絡,被判處10年監禁周四(6月23日)。受害者之一是馬克•美林美國聯合創始人兼聯席主席防暴遊戲,以發展流行的遊戲,比如聯賽的傳說和Valorant。何使用了美林的細節在AWS開戶和帶電年代7美元mil (RM22.19mil)後者的美國運通(美國運通)卡為cryptocurrency雲計算服務我。何鴻燊之前認罪12項指控,包括欺詐、非法訪問計算機材料和毒品消費。另外15個類似的指控是對他的量刑考慮。他在180000新元(RM570,723)保釋後由他的父親支付地區法官譚布倫達讓他推遲服刑了一個月來解決他的個人事務。何鴻燊的首次報道2019年10月,當美國司法部發表聲明說,他被指控聯邦犯罪包括電信欺詐和盜竊。 In 2017, he forged US driving licences for others using Photoshop and offered them on a Dark Web forum. In return, the forum owner gave him the names, addresses and credit card details of 70 people. Merrill’s name caught Ho’s attention as he knew of the developer’s association with Riot Games. He was able to get Merrill’s username and password to his Amex account. Upon logging in, he changed the email address to a similar sounding one and took control of the account. Ho then used Merrill’s details to register for a new account with AWS. On at least 40 occasions between November 2017 and January 2018, he used Merrill’s Amex card to purchase about US$5.2mil (RM22.90mil) in cloud computing services. He persuaded AWS to continue providing the services even after not paying a bill worth US$1.8mil (RM7.92mil). He also used Merrill’s details to register and buy cloud-computing services worth around US$250,000 (RM1.10mil) through the Google cloud platform. Merrill ultimately did not lose any money as the services refunded the payments. Ho went on to run the same scheme with AWS using the details of a man named Harold Borland, cheating the company into providing US$21 (RM92) worth of cloud computing services. Between November 2017 and March 2018, Ho mined about 1,470 units of cryptocurrency Ether. He later sold 203 units for around S$350,000 (RM1.10mil), which he spent on personal expenses. Ho was also convicted of drug offences in 2019 for taking methamphetamine. In sentencing, District Judge Tan said he had illegally obtained a massive value of services through the use of stolen identities. “Given the magnitude of his offending, the extent of harm caused and the sophistication employed, deterrence is the dominant sentencing consideration,” she said. The district judge noted that he had not made any restitution to his victims. For cheating by personation, Ho could have been jailed for up to five years and fined. For each count of unauthorised access to computer material, Ho could have been fined S$5,000 (RM15,856) and jailed for up to two years. – The Straits Times (Singapore)/Asia News Network Article type: free